| | | | | | |

Core i7-4720HQ vs Xeon E5-2620 v4


Description
The i7-4720HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4720HQ gets a score of 132.3 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.8 times faster than the i7-4720HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
406f1
Core
Haswell
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
47 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2015
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
40.12k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
132.35k points
237.83k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-4720HQ
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.79k
2.6k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
9.64k
7.55k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.34k
2.61k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.76k
2.03k (x0.54)
TOTAL
21.53k
14.79k (x0.69)

Multithread

i7-4720HQ

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.66k
17.41k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
37.71k
75.46k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.38k
26.25k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.94k
4.65k (x0.78)
TOTAL
71.69k
123.78k (x1.73)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4720HQ
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
20.68k
12.16k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
10.28k
11.82k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
3.02k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
2.4k (x0.56)
TOTAL
40.12k
29.39k (x0.73)

Multithread

i7-4720HQ

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
66.84k
103.77k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
42.85k
102.28k (x2.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.77k
26.13k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.88k
5.65k (x0.96)
TOTAL
132.35k
237.83k (x1.8)

Performance/W
i7-4720HQ
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1422 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
912 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
357 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
2816 points/W
2798 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4720HQ
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5745 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2856 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1352 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1191 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
11143 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4