Core i7-4720HQ vs i5-10400
Description
The i7-4720HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4720HQ gets a score of 132.3 k points while the i5-10400 gets 367.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 2.8 times faster than the i7-4720HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4720HQ gets a score of 132.3 k points while the i5-10400 gets 367.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 2.8 times faster than the i7-4720HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
a0653
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
47 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2015
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
40.12k points
69.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
132.35k points
367.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4720HQ
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
20.68k
27.46k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
10.28k
24.28k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
5.65k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
11.92k (x2.78)
TOTAL
40.12k
69.31k (x1.73)
Multithread
i7-4720HQ
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
66.84k
165.5k (x2.48)
Test#2 (FP)
42.85k
156.32k (x3.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.77k
39.88k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.88k
5.96k (x1.01)
TOTAL
132.35k
367.65k (x2.78)
Performance/W
i7-4720HQ
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
1422 points/W
2546 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
912 points/W
2405 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
357 points/W
614 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
2816 points/W
5656 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4720HQ
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
5745 points/GHz
6386 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2856 points/GHz
5647 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1352 points/GHz
1314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1191 points/GHz
2772 points/GHz
TOTAL
11143 points/GHz
16118 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4