| | | | | | |

Core i7-4720HQ vs Celeron J4105


Description
The i7-4720HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4720HQ gets a score of 71.7 k points while the J4105 gets 41.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4720HQ is 1.7 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
706a1
Core
Haswell
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
47 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2015
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
40.12k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
132.35k points
61.49k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-4720HQ
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
3.79k
1.68k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
9.64k
5.29k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.34k
2.75k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.76k
3.44k (x0.92)
TOTAL
21.53k
13.16k (x0.61)

Multithread

i7-4720HQ

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
11.66k
6.39k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
37.71k
20.02k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.38k
10.22k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.94k
4.94k (x0.83)
TOTAL
71.69k
41.57k (x0.58)

Performance/W
i7-4720HQ
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
248 points/W
639 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
802 points/W
2002 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
348 points/W
1022 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
126 points/W
494 points/W
TOTAL
1525 points/W
4157 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4720HQ
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
1053 points/GHz
673 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2677 points/GHz
2116 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1206 points/GHz
1099 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1044 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
TOTAL
5980 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4