| | | | | | |

Core i7-4720HQ vs Celeron G3900TE


Description
The i7-4720HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the G3900TE is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4720HQ gets a score of 71.7 k points while the G3900TE gets 31.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4720HQ is 2.3 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
506e3
Core
Haswell
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
47 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2015
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
40.12k points
27.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
132.35k points
49.34k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-4720HQ
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
3.79k
2.36k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
9.64k
9.79k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.34k
3.08k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.76k
3.36k (x0.89)
TOTAL
21.53k
18.59k (x0.86)

Multithread

i7-4720HQ

G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
11.66k
4.45k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
37.71k
18.16k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.38k
5.48k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.94k
3.5k (x0.59)
TOTAL
71.69k
31.59k (x0.44)

Performance/W
i7-4720HQ
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
248 points/W
127 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
802 points/W
519 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
348 points/W
156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
126 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
1525 points/W
903 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4720HQ
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
1053 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2677 points/GHz
4259 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1206 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1044 points/GHz
1461 points/GHz
TOTAL
5980 points/GHz
8084 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4