Core i7-4720HQ vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
Description
The i7-4720HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4720HQ gets a score of 132.3 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 3.3 times faster than the i7-4720HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4720HQ gets a score of 132.3 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 3.3 times faster than the i7-4720HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
a50f00
Core
Haswell
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
47 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2015
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
40.12k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
132.35k points
434.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4720HQ
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
20.68k
21.2k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
10.28k
25k (x2.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
11.44k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
24.22k (x5.65)
TOTAL
40.12k
81.87k (x2.04)
Multithread
i7-4720HQ
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
66.84k
145.13k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
42.85k
198.36k (x4.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.77k
85.67k (x5.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.88k
5.79k (x0.98)
TOTAL
132.35k
434.96k (x3.29)
Performance/W
i7-4720HQ
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
1422 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
912 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
357 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
2816 points/W
12427 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4720HQ
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5745 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2856 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1352 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1191 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
11143 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4