Core i7-4720HQ vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Description
The i7-4720HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4720HQ gets a score of 132.3 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.5 times faster than the i7-4720HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4720HQ gets a score of 132.3 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.5 times faster than the i7-4720HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
47 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2015
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
40.12k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
132.35k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4720HQ
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
20.68k
14.58k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
10.28k
23.98k (x2.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
5.35k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
6.34k (x1.48)
TOTAL
40.12k
50.25k (x1.25)
Multithread
i7-4720HQ
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
66.84k
57.37k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
42.85k
107.03k (x2.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.77k
28.9k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.88k
7.05k (x1.2)
TOTAL
132.35k
200.34k (x1.51)
Performance/W
i7-4720HQ
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1422 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
912 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
357 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
2816 points/W
3082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4720HQ
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5745 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2856 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1352 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1191 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
11143 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4