| | | | | | |

Core i7-4720HQ vs i5-12400F


Description
The i7-4720HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4720HQ gets a score of 132.3 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 3 times faster than the i7-4720HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
90675
Core
Haswell
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
47 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2015
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
40.12k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
132.35k points
399.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-4720HQ
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3.79k
7.43k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
9.64k
18.64k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.34k
13.15k (x3.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.76k
14.82k (x3.94)
TOTAL
21.53k
54.04k (x2.51)

Multithread

i7-4720HQ

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
11.66k
36.23k (x3.11)
Test#2 (FP)
37.71k
134.76k (x3.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.38k
84.06k (x5.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.94k
16.71k (x2.81)
TOTAL
71.69k
271.76k (x3.79)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4720HQ
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
20.68k
33.85k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
10.28k
20.33k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
10.51k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
11.77k (x2.75)
TOTAL
40.12k
76.46k (x1.91)

Multithread

i7-4720HQ

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
66.84k
174.21k (x2.61)
Test#2 (FP)
42.85k
141.31k (x3.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.77k
64.86k (x3.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.88k
19.01k (x3.23)
TOTAL
132.35k
399.39k (x3.02)

Performance/W
i7-4720HQ
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1422 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
912 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
357 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
125 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
2816 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4720HQ
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5745 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2856 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1352 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1191 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
11143 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4