Core i7-4710HQ vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The i7-4710HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4710HQ gets a score of 155.2 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-4710HQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4710HQ gets a score of 155.2 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-4710HQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
406f1
Core
Haswell
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4 /4
8/16
TDP
47 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2014
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
40.65k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
155.24k points
237.83k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4710HQ
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
20.98k
12.16k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
10.48k
11.82k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
3.02k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
2.4k (x0.54)
TOTAL
40.65k
29.39k (x0.72)
Multithread
i7-4710HQ
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
77.73k
103.77k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
52.12k
102.28k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
26.13k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
5.65k (x1.16)
TOTAL
155.24k
237.83k (x1.53)
Performance/W
i7-4710HQ
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1654 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
3303 points/W
2798 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4710HQ
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5994 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2993 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1269 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
11614 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4