Core i7-4710HQ vs i7-8650U
Description
The i7-4710HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-8650U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4710HQ gets a score of 155.2 k points while the i7-8650U gets 173.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8650U is 1.1 times faster than the i7-4710HQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4710HQ gets a score of 155.2 k points while the i7-8650U gets 173.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8650U is 1.1 times faster than the i7-4710HQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
806ea
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/8
TDP
47 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2014
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
40.65k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
155.24k points
173.49k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4710HQ
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.98k
21.61k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
10.48k
19.69k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
4.61k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
9.95k (x2.24)
TOTAL
40.65k
55.86k (x1.37)
Multithread
i7-4710HQ
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
77.73k
78.38k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
52.12k
72.02k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
16.95k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
6.15k (x1.27)
TOTAL
155.24k
173.49k (x1.12)
Performance/W
i7-4710HQ
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
1654 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
4802 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
1130 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
410 points/W
TOTAL
3303 points/W
11566 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4710HQ
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
5994 points/GHz
5146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2993 points/GHz
4689 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1097 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1269 points/GHz
2368 points/GHz
TOTAL
11614 points/GHz
13300 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4