| | | | | | |

Core i7-4710HQ vs i5-8300H


Description
The i7-4710HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4710HQ gets a score of 155.2 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8300H is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4710HQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
906ea
Core
Haswell
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/8
TDP
47 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2014
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
40.65k points
56.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
155.24k points
182.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4710HQ
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.98k
23.6k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
10.48k
21.72k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
4.61k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
6.8k (x1.53)
TOTAL
40.65k
56.72k (x1.4)

Multithread

i7-4710HQ

i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
77.73k
79.12k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
52.12k
81.27k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
17.46k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
4.62k (x0.95)
TOTAL
155.24k
182.47k (x1.18)

Performance/W
i7-4710HQ
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1654 points/W
1758 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
1806 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
3303 points/W
4055 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4710HQ
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5994 points/GHz
5899 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2993 points/GHz
5431 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1152 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1269 points/GHz
1699 points/GHz
TOTAL
11614 points/GHz
14181 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4