| | | | | | |

Core i7-4710HQ vs i5-7200U


Description
The i7-4710HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4710HQ gets a score of 155.2 k points while the i5-7200U gets 97.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4710HQ is 1.6 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
806e9
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4 /4
2/4
TDP
47 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2014
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
40.65k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
155.24k points
97.52k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4710HQ
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.98k
19.34k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
10.48k
17.47k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
4.08k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
4.04k (x0.91)
TOTAL
40.65k
44.94k (x1.11)

Multithread

i7-4710HQ

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
77.73k
42.86k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
52.12k
41.3k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
9.69k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
3.68k (x0.76)
TOTAL
155.24k
97.52k (x0.63)

Performance/W
i7-4710HQ
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1654 points/W
2857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
2753 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
646 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
245 points/W
TOTAL
3303 points/W
6501 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4710HQ
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5994 points/GHz
6239 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2993 points/GHz
5637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1269 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
TOTAL
11614 points/GHz
14496 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4