| | | | | | |

Core i7-4710HQ vs i3-8100


Description
The i7-4710HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4710HQ gets a score of 155.2 k points while the i3-8100 gets 200.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4710HQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
906eb
Core
Haswell
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/4
TDP
47 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2014
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
40.65k points
59.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
155.24k points
200.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4710HQ
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
20.98k
24.47k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
10.48k
21.52k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
4.95k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
8.24k (x1.86)
TOTAL
40.65k
59.18k (x1.46)

Multithread

i7-4710HQ

i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
77.73k
92.86k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
52.12k
83.05k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
18.55k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
5.93k (x1.22)
TOTAL
155.24k
200.4k (x1.29)

Performance/W
i7-4710HQ
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
1654 points/W
1429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
3303 points/W
3083 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4710HQ
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
5994 points/GHz
6797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2993 points/GHz
5977 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1269 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
11614 points/GHz
16438 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4