Core i7-4710HQ vs Ryzen 7 6800H
Description
The i7-4710HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4710HQ gets a score of 155.2 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 3.1 times faster than the i7-4710HQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4710HQ gets a score of 155.2 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 3.1 times faster than the i7-4710HQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
a40f41
Core
Haswell
Rembrandt
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
4 /4
8/16
TDP
47 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2014
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
40.65k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
155.24k points
478.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4710HQ
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.98k
21.04k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
10.48k
22.41k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
10.21k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
24.27k (x5.46)
TOTAL
40.65k
77.93k (x1.92)
Multithread
i7-4710HQ
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
77.73k
158.65k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
52.12k
215.86k (x4.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
89.45k (x4.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
14.77k (x3.04)
TOTAL
155.24k
478.73k (x3.08)
Performance/W
i7-4710HQ
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1654 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
3303 points/W
10638 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4710HQ
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5994 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2993 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1269 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
11614 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4