| | | | | | |

Core i7-4710HQ vs Ryzen 3 1200


Description
The i7-4710HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the 1200 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4710HQ gets a score of 155.2 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4710HQ is 1.3 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
800f11
Core
Haswell
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
AM4
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/4
TDP
47 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2014
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
40.65k points
37.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
155.24k points
117.81k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4710HQ
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
20.98k
11.73k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
10.48k
18.85k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
4.22k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
2.76k (x0.62)
TOTAL
40.65k
37.55k (x0.92)

Multithread

i7-4710HQ

1200
Test#1 (Integers)
77.73k
38.56k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
52.12k
62.21k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
13.7k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
3.33k (x0.69)
TOTAL
155.24k
117.81k (x0.76)

Performance/W
i7-4710HQ
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
1654 points/W
593 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
957 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
211 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
3303 points/W
1812 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4710HQ
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
5994 points/GHz
3449 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2993 points/GHz
5544 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1242 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1269 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
11614 points/GHz
11045 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4