| | | | | | |

Core i7-4710HQ vs i3-1115G4


Description
The i7-4710HQ is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4710HQ gets a score of 155.2 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4710HQ is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
806c1
Core
Haswell
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4 /4
2/4
TDP
47 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2014
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
40.65k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
155.24k points
137.96k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4710HQ
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
20.98k
24.25k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
10.48k
21.63k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
9.09k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
7.23k (x1.63)
TOTAL
40.65k
62.19k (x1.53)

Multithread

i7-4710HQ

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
77.73k
56.9k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
52.12k
55.68k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
19.29k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
6.09k (x1.25)
TOTAL
155.24k
137.96k (x0.89)

Performance/W
i7-4710HQ
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1654 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
3303 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4710HQ
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5994 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2993 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1269 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
11614 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4