Core i7-4702MQ vs Xeon E5506
Description
The i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell architecture while the E5506 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 75.9 k points while the E5506 gets 59.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 1.3 times faster than the E5506 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 75.9 k points while the E5506 gets 59.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 1.3 times faster than the E5506 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
106a5
Core
Haswell
Gainestown
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
Socket G3
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4 /4
TDP
37 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2013
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
36.8k points
9.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.15k points
90.45k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-4702MQ
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
3.45k
1.21k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
2.75k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
1.94k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
0.78k (x0.22)
TOTAL
19.47k
6.68k (x0.34)
Multithread
i7-4702MQ
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
11.93k
12.25k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
42.4k
25.55k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18k
17.1k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
5.01k (x1.39)
TOTAL
75.92k
59.9k (x0.79)
Performance/W
i7-4702MQ
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
323 points/W
153 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1146 points/W
319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
486 points/W
214 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
97 points/W
63 points/W
TOTAL
2052 points/W
749 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4702MQ
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1078 points/GHz
565 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/GHz
1291 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
910 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1096 points/GHz
366 points/GHz
TOTAL
6085 points/GHz
3132 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4