| | | | | | |

Core i7-4702MQ vs Xeon E5-2697 v2


Description
The i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 75.9 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 419.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 5.5 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
306e4
Core
Haswell
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
Socket G3
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4 /8
12 /24
TDP
37 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
30720 kB
Date
May 2013
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
36.8k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.15k points
633.14k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-4702MQ
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3.45k
3.44k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
9.54k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.21k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.94k (x1.12)
TOTAL
19.47k
21.13k (x1.09)

Multithread

i7-4702MQ

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
11.93k
73.17k (x6.13)
Test#2 (FP)
42.4k
230.83k (x5.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18k
107.14k (x5.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
7.99k (x2.22)
TOTAL
75.92k
419.12k (x5.52)

Performance/W
i7-4702MQ
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
323 points/W
563 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1146 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
486 points/W
824 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
97 points/W
61 points/W
TOTAL
2052 points/W
3224 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4702MQ
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1078 points/GHz
982 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/GHz
2726 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1203 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1096 points/GHz
1126 points/GHz
TOTAL
6085 points/GHz
6036 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4