| | | | | | |

Core i7-4702MQ vs Xeon Bronze 3206R


Description
The i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 145.1 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.5 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
50657
Core
Haswell
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
Socket G3
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4 /8
8/8
TDP
37 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
11264 kB
Date
May 2013
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
36.8k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.15k points
216.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-4702MQ
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
3.45k
1.97k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
8.15k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
2.37k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
4.84k (x1.38)
TOTAL
19.47k
17.32k (x0.89)

Multithread

i7-4702MQ

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
11.93k
15.73k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
42.4k
64.78k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18k
18.06k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
5.21k (x1.45)
TOTAL
75.92k
103.77k (x1.37)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4702MQ
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
18.98k
12.92k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
10.97k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.32k
2.54k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
5.09k (x1.27)
TOTAL
36.8k
31.52k (x0.86)

Multithread

i7-4702MQ

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
74.75k
103.33k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
47.72k
87.67k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.65k
20.1k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
4.91k (x1.62)
TOTAL
145.15k
216.02k (x1.49)

Performance/W
i7-4702MQ
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
2020 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1290 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
531 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
2541 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4702MQ
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
5932 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2968 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1248 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
11499 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4