Core i7-4702MQ vs Pentium G2020
Description
The i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell architecture while the G2020 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 75.9 k points while the G2020 gets 31.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 2.4 times faster than the G2020 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 75.9 k points while the G2020 gets 31.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 2.4 times faster than the G2020 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
306a9
Core
Haswell
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
Socket G3
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4 /8
2/2
TDP
37 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2013
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
36.8k points
25.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.15k points
42.39k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-4702MQ
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
3.45k
2.94k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
8.23k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
3.69k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
2.46k (x0.7)
TOTAL
19.47k
17.33k (x0.89)
Multithread
i7-4702MQ
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
11.93k
5.54k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
42.4k
15.47k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18k
7.06k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
2.99k (x0.83)
TOTAL
75.92k
31.05k (x0.41)
Performance/W
i7-4702MQ
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
323 points/W
101 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1146 points/W
281 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
486 points/W
128 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
97 points/W
54 points/W
TOTAL
2052 points/W
565 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4702MQ
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
1078 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/GHz
2839 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1096 points/GHz
849 points/GHz
TOTAL
6085 points/GHz
5976 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4