Core i7-4702MQ vs m3-7Y30
Description
The i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell architecture while the m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 145.1 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 2.7 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 145.1 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 2.7 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
806e9
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
Socket G3
BGA 1515
Cores/Threads
4 /8
2/4
TDP
37 W
4.5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2013
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
36.8k points
25.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.15k points
52.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4702MQ
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
18.98k
10.02k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
9.22k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.32k
2.04k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
4.31k (x1.08)
TOTAL
36.8k
25.6k (x0.7)
Multithread
i7-4702MQ
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
74.75k
21.75k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
47.72k
20.51k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.65k
4.97k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
5.56k (x1.84)
TOTAL
145.15k
52.78k (x0.36)
Performance/W
i7-4702MQ
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
2020 points/W
4832 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1290 points/W
4557 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
531 points/W
1104 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
1236 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
11730 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4702MQ
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
5932 points/GHz
3852 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2968 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
786 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1248 points/GHz
1659 points/GHz
TOTAL
11499 points/GHz
9844 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4