Core i7-4702MQ vs i5-8265U
Description
The i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 145.1 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 145.1 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
806eb
Core
Haswell
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket G3
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/8
TDP
37 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2013
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
36.8k points
57.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.15k points
149.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4702MQ
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.98k
24.32k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
20.35k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.32k
4.38k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
8.52k (x2.13)
TOTAL
36.8k
57.57k (x1.56)
Multithread
i7-4702MQ
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
74.75k
65.17k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
47.72k
63.6k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.65k
14.4k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
6.31k (x2.09)
TOTAL
145.15k
149.48k (x1.03)
Performance/W
i7-4702MQ
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
2020 points/W
4345 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1290 points/W
4240 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
531 points/W
960 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
9965 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4702MQ
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
5932 points/GHz
6235 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2968 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1248 points/GHz
2183 points/GHz
TOTAL
11499 points/GHz
14762 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4