| | | | | | |

Core i7-4702MQ vs i5-10210U


Description
The i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 145.1 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
806ec
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
Socket G3
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/8
TDP
37 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2013
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.8k points
56.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.15k points
147.78k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4702MQ
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.98k
22.96k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
20.8k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.32k
4.76k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
7.5k (x1.88)
TOTAL
36.8k
56.03k (x1.52)

Multithread

i7-4702MQ

i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
74.75k
66.43k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
47.72k
62.38k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.65k
14.52k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
4.45k (x1.47)
TOTAL
145.15k
147.78k (x1.02)

Performance/W
i7-4702MQ
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
2020 points/W
4429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1290 points/W
4158 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
531 points/W
968 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
297 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
9852 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4702MQ
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
5932 points/GHz
5468 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2968 points/GHz
4953 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1248 points/GHz
1785 points/GHz
TOTAL
11499 points/GHz
13340 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4