| | | | | | |

Core i7-4702MQ vs i3-5005U


Description
The i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-5005U is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 145.1 k points while the i3-5005U gets 55 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 2.6 times faster than the i3-5005U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
306d4
Core
Haswell
Broadwell-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket G3
Cores/Threads
4 /8
2 /2
TDP
37 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2013
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
36.8k points
25.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.15k points
54.99k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4702MQ
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.98k
11.08k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
9.5k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.32k
2.51k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
2.52k (x0.63)
TOTAL
36.8k
25.61k (x0.7)

Multithread

i7-4702MQ

i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
74.75k
23.11k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
47.72k
22.79k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.65k
6.06k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
3.03k (x1)
TOTAL
145.15k
54.99k (x0.38)

Performance/W
i7-4702MQ
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
2020 points/W
1541 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1290 points/W
1519 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
531 points/W
404 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
202 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
3666 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4702MQ
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
5932 points/GHz
5541 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2968 points/GHz
4749 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1248 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
TOTAL
11499 points/GHz
12804 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4