| | | | | | |

Core i7-4702MQ vs Celeron J4105


Description
The i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 75.9 k points while the J4105 gets 41.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 1.8 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
706a1
Core
Haswell
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket G3
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/4
TDP
37 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
0 kB
Date
May 2013
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
36.8k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.15k points
61.49k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-4702MQ
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
3.45k
1.68k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
5.29k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
2.75k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.44k (x0.98)
TOTAL
19.47k
13.16k (x0.68)

Multithread

i7-4702MQ

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
11.93k
6.39k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
42.4k
20.02k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18k
10.22k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
4.94k (x1.37)
TOTAL
75.92k
41.57k (x0.55)

Performance/W
i7-4702MQ
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
323 points/W
639 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1146 points/W
2002 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
486 points/W
1022 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
97 points/W
494 points/W
TOTAL
2052 points/W
4157 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4702MQ
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
1078 points/GHz
673 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/GHz
2116 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1099 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1096 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
TOTAL
6085 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4