| | | | | | |

Core i7-4702MQ vs Celeron G3900TE


Description
The i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell architecture while the G3900TE is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 75.9 k points while the G3900TE gets 31.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 2.4 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
506e3
Core
Haswell
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
Socket G3
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4 /8
2/2
TDP
37 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2048 kB
Date
May 2013
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
36.8k points
27.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.15k points
49.34k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-4702MQ
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
3.45k
2.36k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
9.79k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
3.08k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.36k (x0.96)
TOTAL
19.47k
18.59k (x0.95)

Multithread

i7-4702MQ

G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
11.93k
4.45k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
42.4k
18.16k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18k
5.48k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
3.5k (x0.97)
TOTAL
75.92k
31.59k (x0.42)

Performance/W
i7-4702MQ
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
323 points/W
127 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1146 points/W
519 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
486 points/W
156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
97 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
2052 points/W
903 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4702MQ
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
1078 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/GHz
4259 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1096 points/GHz
1461 points/GHz
TOTAL
6085 points/GHz
8084 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4