| | | | | | |

Core i7-4702MQ vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 145.1 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.4 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f10
Core
Haswell
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket G3
AM4
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/8
TDP
37 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2013
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
36.8k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.15k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-4702MQ
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.45k
3.8k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
17.38k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.17k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.16k (x0.9)
TOTAL
19.47k
29.52k (x1.52)

Multithread

i7-4702MQ

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
11.93k
15.28k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
42.4k
76.44k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18k
27.48k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
3.02k (x0.84)
TOTAL
75.92k
122.2k (x1.61)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4702MQ
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
18.98k
14.2k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
23.23k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.32k
5.35k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
5.18k (x1.3)
TOTAL
36.8k
47.96k (x1.3)

Multithread

i7-4702MQ

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
74.75k
58.24k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
47.72k
105.72k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.65k
28.73k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
5.59k (x1.85)
TOTAL
145.15k
198.27k (x1.37)

Performance/W
i7-4702MQ
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2020 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1290 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
531 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4702MQ
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5932 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2968 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1248 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
11499 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4