Core i7-4702MQ vs Ryzen 3 3350U
Description
The i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 145.1 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 1 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 145.1 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 1 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
Socket G3
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/4
TDP
37 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2013
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.8k points
43.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.15k points
144.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4702MQ
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.98k
13.25k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
21.67k (x2.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.32k
4.79k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
3.98k (x1)
TOTAL
36.8k
43.7k (x1.19)
Multithread
i7-4702MQ
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
74.75k
46.47k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
47.72k
78.38k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.65k
16.69k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
3.3k (x1.09)
TOTAL
145.15k
144.84k (x1)
Performance/W
i7-4702MQ
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
2020 points/W
3098 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1290 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
531 points/W
1113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
9656 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4702MQ
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
5932 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2968 points/GHz
6191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
1369 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1248 points/GHz
1138 points/GHz
TOTAL
11499 points/GHz
12485 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4