Core i7-4702MQ vs Ryzen 3 1200
Description
The i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell architecture while the 1200 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 145.1 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 1.2 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 145.1 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 1.2 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
800f11
Core
Haswell
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
Socket G3
AM4
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/4
TDP
37 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2013
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
36.8k points
37.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.15k points
117.81k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4702MQ
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
18.98k
11.73k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
18.85k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.32k
4.22k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
2.76k (x0.69)
TOTAL
36.8k
37.55k (x1.02)
Multithread
i7-4702MQ
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
74.75k
38.56k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
47.72k
62.21k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.65k
13.7k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
3.33k (x1.1)
TOTAL
145.15k
117.81k (x0.81)
Performance/W
i7-4702MQ
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
2020 points/W
593 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1290 points/W
957 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
531 points/W
211 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
1812 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4702MQ
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
5932 points/GHz
3449 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2968 points/GHz
5544 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
1242 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1248 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
11499 points/GHz
11045 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4