| | | | | | |

Core i7-4702MQ vs A6 9220e


Description
The i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell architecture while the 9220e is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4702MQ gets a score of 145.1 k points while the 9220e gets 29.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 4.9 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
670f00
Core
Haswell
Stoney Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
Socket G3
BGA-FT4
Cores/Threads
4 /8
2/2
TDP
37 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
0 kB
Date
May 2013
June 2017
Mean monothread perf.
36.8k points
22.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.15k points
29.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4702MQ
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
18.98k
7.84k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
10.54k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.32k
2.27k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
1.7k (x0.43)
TOTAL
36.8k
22.34k (x0.61)

Multithread

i7-4702MQ

9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
74.75k
11.42k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
47.72k
12.58k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.65k
3.62k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
1.77k (x0.59)
TOTAL
145.15k
29.39k (x0.2)

Performance/W
i7-4702MQ
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
2020 points/W
1903 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1290 points/W
2097 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
531 points/W
603 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
3923 points/W
4898 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4702MQ
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
5932 points/GHz
3265 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2968 points/GHz
4390 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
944 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1248 points/GHz
709 points/GHz
TOTAL
11499 points/GHz
9309 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4