| | | | | | |

Core i7-4600U vs i7-6820HQ


Description
The i7-4600U is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4600U gets a score of 64.5 k points while the i7-6820HQ gets 205.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6820HQ is 3.2 times faster than the i7-4600U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
506e3
Core
Haswell
Skylake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2013
October 2015
Mean monothread perf.
28.98k points
50.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.55k points
205.89k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4600U
i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
14.37k
20.99k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
8.31k
18.63k (x2.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
4.33k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
6.15k (x2.08)
TOTAL
28.98k
50.1k (x1.73)

Multithread

i7-4600U

i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
31.32k
91.8k (x2.93)
Test#2 (FP)
20.17k
87.24k (x4.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.02k
20.55k (x2.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.03k
6.3k (x1.25)
TOTAL
64.55k
205.89k (x3.19)

Performance/W
i7-4600U
i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2088 points/W
2040 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1345 points/W
1939 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
535 points/W
457 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
336 points/W
140 points/W
TOTAL
4303 points/W
4575 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4600U
i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4353 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2517 points/GHz
5174 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
1204 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
896 points/GHz
1708 points/GHz
TOTAL
8781 points/GHz
13917 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4