Core i7-4600U vs Ryzen 5 3550H
Description
The i7-4600U is based on Haswell architecture while the 3550H is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4600U gets a score of 64.5 k points while the 3550H gets 178.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3550H is 2.8 times faster than the i7-4600U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4600U gets a score of 64.5 k points while the 3550H gets 178.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3550H is 2.8 times faster than the i7-4600U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2013
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
28.98k points
45.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.55k points
178.26k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4600U
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.37k
13.51k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
8.31k
22.34k (x2.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
4.98k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
4.24k (x1.43)
TOTAL
28.98k
45.07k (x1.56)
Multithread
i7-4600U
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
31.32k
52.21k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
20.17k
95.66k (x4.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.02k
25.54k (x3.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.03k
4.85k (x0.96)
TOTAL
64.55k
178.26k (x2.76)
Performance/W
i7-4600U
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
2088 points/W
1492 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1345 points/W
2733 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
535 points/W
730 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
336 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
4303 points/W
5093 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4600U
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
4353 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2517 points/GHz
6038 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
896 points/GHz
1145 points/GHz
TOTAL
8781 points/GHz
12182 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4