Core i7-4600U vs Ryzen 5 2600
Description
The i7-4600U is based on Haswell architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4600U gets a score of 64.5 k points while the 2600 gets 292.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 4.5 times faster than the i7-4600U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4600U gets a score of 64.5 k points while the 2600 gets 292.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 4.5 times faster than the i7-4600U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
800f82
Core
Haswell
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2013
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
28.98k points
57.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.55k points
292.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4600U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.37k
13.83k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
8.31k
23.16k (x2.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
5.15k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
15.18k (x5.14)
TOTAL
28.98k
57.33k (x1.98)
Multithread
i7-4600U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
31.32k
83.44k (x2.66)
Test#2 (FP)
20.17k
161.53k (x8.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.02k
40.62k (x5.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.03k
6.72k (x1.34)
TOTAL
64.55k
292.31k (x4.53)
Performance/W
i7-4600U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
2088 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1345 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
535 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
336 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
4303 points/W
4497 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4600U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
4353 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2517 points/GHz
5938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
1321 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
896 points/GHz
3893 points/GHz
TOTAL
8781 points/GHz
14699 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4