| | | | | | |

Core i7-4600U vs Ryzen 3 3200G


Description
The i7-4600U is based on Haswell architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4600U gets a score of 64.5 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.6 times faster than the i7-4600U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2013
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
28.98k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.55k points
168.69k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4600U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.37k
14.48k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
8.31k
23.84k (x2.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
5.43k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
5.46k (x1.85)
TOTAL
28.98k
49.21k (x1.7)

Multithread

i7-4600U

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
31.32k
54.39k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
20.17k
88.77k (x4.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.02k
20.04k (x2.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.03k
5.48k (x1.09)
TOTAL
64.55k
168.69k (x2.61)

Performance/W
i7-4600U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
2088 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1345 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
535 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
336 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
4303 points/W
2595 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4600U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4353 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2517 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
896 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
8781 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4