| | | | | | |

Core i7-4500U vs i3-8130U


Description
The i7-4500U is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4500U gets a score of 66.1 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
806ea
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2013
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
33.02k points
47.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
66.14k points
88.35k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4500U
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.67k
21.09k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
9k
19.41k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.75k
4.05k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
2.8k (x0.78)
TOTAL
33.02k
47.35k (x1.43)

Multithread

i7-4500U

i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
31.77k
38.23k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
21.36k
38.89k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.95k
8.75k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
2.47k (x0.49)
TOTAL
66.14k
88.35k (x1.34)

Performance/W
i7-4500U
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
2118 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1424 points/W
2593 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
530 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
338 points/W
165 points/W
TOTAL
4410 points/W
5890 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4500U
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
5558 points/GHz
6204 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3001 points/GHz
5708 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1250 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1199 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
11008 points/GHz
13925 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4