| | | | | | |

Core i7-4500U vs Ryzen 5 4600H


Description
The i7-4500U is based on Haswell architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4500U gets a score of 66.1 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4600H is 5.1 times faster than the i7-4500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
860f01
Core
Haswell
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2 /2
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
June 2013
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
33.02k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
66.14k points
334.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4500U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.67k
15.48k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
9k
22.82k (x2.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.75k
8.63k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
7.17k (x1.99)
TOTAL
33.02k
54.11k (x1.64)

Multithread

i7-4500U

4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
31.77k
117.98k (x3.71)
Test#2 (FP)
21.36k
146.43k (x6.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.95k
65.54k (x8.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
4.77k (x0.94)
TOTAL
66.14k
334.72k (x5.06)

Performance/W
i7-4500U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
2118 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1424 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
530 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
338 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
4410 points/W
7438 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-4500U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
5558 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3001 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1250 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1199 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
11008 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4