| | | | | | |

Core i7-3930K vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The i7-3930K is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3930K gets a score of 155.9 k points while the 2200U gets 68.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-3930K is 2.3 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206d7
810f10
Core
Sandy Bridge-E
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2011
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
27.76k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
155.86k points
71.02k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3930K
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
11.54k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
9.06k
19.69k (x2.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.45k
4.55k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.16k
3.25k (x0.78)
TOTAL
27.76k
39.03k (x1.41)

Multithread

i7-3930K

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
62.22k
19.25k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
60.25k
36.27k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.42k
10.2k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.97k
3.07k (x1.03)
TOTAL
155.86k
68.8k (x0.44)

Performance/W
i7-3930K
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
479 points/W
1283 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
463 points/W
2418 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
234 points/W
680 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
23 points/W
205 points/W
TOTAL
1199 points/W
4586 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-3930K
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2653 points/GHz
3394 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2383 points/GHz
5792 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1172 points/GHz
1339 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1096 points/GHz
956 points/GHz
TOTAL
7304 points/GHz
11480 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4