Core i7-3770K vs Xeon E5-2690 0
Description
The i7-3770K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3770K gets a score of 133.9 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-3770K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3770K gets a score of 133.9 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-3770K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
206d7
Core
Ivy Bridge
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
8 /16
TDP
77 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x62+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2012
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
36.19k points
23.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
133.88k points
185.26k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3770K
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
12.99k
8.76k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
12.42k
7.35k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
3.86k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.73k
3.32k (x0.58)
TOTAL
36.19k
23.28k (x0.64)
Multithread
i7-3770K
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
50.36k
78.51k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
55.16k
66.46k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.31k
36.42k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.05k
3.88k (x0.77)
TOTAL
133.88k
185.26k (x1.38)
Performance/W
i7-3770K
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
654 points/W
582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
716 points/W
492 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
303 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
29 points/W
TOTAL
1739 points/W
1372 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-3770K
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
3331 points/GHz
2305 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3186 points/GHz
1933 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1292 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1470 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
TOTAL
9280 points/GHz
6127 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4