Core i7-3770K vs Ryzen 5 3550H
Description
The i7-3770K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 3550H is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3770K gets a score of 97.4 k points while the 3550H gets 108.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3550H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-3770K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3770K gets a score of 97.4 k points while the 3550H gets 108.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3550H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-3770K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
810f81
Core
Ivy Bridge
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
77 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x62+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2012
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.19k points
45.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
133.88k points
178.26k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-3770K
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.86k
3.63k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
10.79k
16.69k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.9k
4.92k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
5k (x0.91)
TOTAL
25.06k
30.24k (x1.21)
Multithread
i7-3770K
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.17k
13.62k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
46.25k
65.71k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.67k
23.7k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.36k
5.64k (x0.54)
TOTAL
97.44k
108.67k (x1.12)
Performance/W
i7-3770K
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
223 points/W
389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
601 points/W
1877 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
677 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
1265 points/W
3105 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-3770K
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
990 points/GHz
982 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2768 points/GHz
4512 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1256 points/GHz
1329 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1412 points/GHz
1352 points/GHz
TOTAL
6426 points/GHz
8174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4