| | | | | | |

Core i7-3770K vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The i7-3770K is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3770K gets a score of 133.9 k points while the 2400G gets 188.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.4 times faster than the i7-3770K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
810f10
Core
Ivy Bridge
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
77 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x62+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2012
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
36.19k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
133.88k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-3770K
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.86k
3.8k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
10.79k
17.38k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.9k
5.17k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
3.16k (x0.57)
TOTAL
25.06k
29.52k (x1.18)

Multithread

i7-3770K

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
17.17k
15.28k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
46.25k
76.44k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.67k
27.48k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.36k
3.02k (x0.29)
TOTAL
97.44k
122.2k (x1.25)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3770K
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
12.99k
13.04k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
12.42k
22.35k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
5.37k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.73k
3.4k (x0.59)
TOTAL
36.19k
44.15k (x1.22)

Multithread

i7-3770K

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
50.36k
56.49k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
55.16k
100.74k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.31k
28.21k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.05k
3.04k (x0.6)
TOTAL
133.88k
188.49k (x1.41)

Performance/W
i7-3770K
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
654 points/W
869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
716 points/W
1550 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
303 points/W
434 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
47 points/W
TOTAL
1739 points/W
2900 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-3770K
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3331 points/GHz
3343 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3186 points/GHz
5731 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1292 points/GHz
1376 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1470 points/GHz
871 points/GHz
TOTAL
9280 points/GHz
11321 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4