| | | | | | |

Core i7-3770 vs i5-8250U


Description
The i7-3770 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3770 gets a score of 133.7 k points while the i5-8250U gets 137.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1 times faster than the i7-3770 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
806ea
Core
Ivy Bridge
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
77 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x62+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2012
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
34.59k points
54.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
133.7k points
161.26k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3770
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
12.59k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
12.11k
18.89k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
4.65k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
8.2k (x1.56)
TOTAL
34.59k
44.32k (x1.28)

Multithread

i7-3770

i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
49.56k
45.91k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
56.21k
69.55k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.17k
16.79k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.75k
4.83k (x0.84)
TOTAL
133.7k
137.09k (x1.03)

Performance/W
i7-3770
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
644 points/W
3061 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
730 points/W
4637 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
288 points/W
1120 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
75 points/W
322 points/W
TOTAL
1736 points/W
9139 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-3770
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
3217 points/GHz
3702 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3104 points/GHz
5556 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1202 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1347 points/GHz
2411 points/GHz
TOTAL
8870 points/GHz
13036 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4