Core i7-3770 vs FX 8350
Description
The i7-3770 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 8350 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3770 gets a score of 133.7 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-3770 is 1.1 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3770 gets a score of 133.7 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-3770 is 1.1 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
600f20
Core
Ivy Bridge
Vishera
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
77 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x62+4x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2012
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
34.59k points
28.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
133.7k points
118.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3770
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
9.85k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
12.11k
8.41k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
3.58k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
6.32k (x1.2)
TOTAL
34.59k
28.16k (x0.81)
Multithread
i7-3770
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
49.56k
44.93k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
56.21k
45.21k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.17k
22.81k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.75k
5.19k (x0.9)
TOTAL
133.7k
118.14k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i7-3770
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
644 points/W
359 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
730 points/W
362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
288 points/W
182 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
75 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
1736 points/W
945 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-3770
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
3217 points/GHz
2402 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3104 points/GHz
2050 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1202 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1347 points/GHz
1541 points/GHz
TOTAL
8870 points/GHz
6867 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4