Core i7-2640M vs i5-9500T
Description
The i7-2640M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-2640M gets a score of 54.9 k points while the i5-9500T gets 211.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 3.9 times faster than the i7-2640M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-2640M gets a score of 54.9 k points while the i5-9500T gets 211.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 3.9 times faster than the i7-2640M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
906ea
Core
Sandy Bridge
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
PGA 988B
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
9216 kB
Date
September 2011
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
25.86k points
61.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
54.86k points
274.02k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-2640M
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.63k
13.46k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
8.33k
20.21k (x2.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.08k
4.72k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.82k
10.25k (x2.68)
TOTAL
25.86k
48.64k (x1.88)
Multithread
i7-2640M
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
21.22k
74.65k (x3.52)
Test#2 (FP)
19.6k
110.86k (x5.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.09k
22.08k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
4.12k (x1.05)
TOTAL
54.86k
211.7k (x3.86)
Performance/W
i7-2640M
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
606 points/W
2133 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
560 points/W
3167 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
288 points/W
631 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
1567 points/W
6049 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-2640M
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
2752 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2380 points/GHz
5462 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1165 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1092 points/GHz
2771 points/GHz
TOTAL
7390 points/GHz
13145 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4