| | | | | | |

Core i7-2640M vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The i7-2640M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-2640M gets a score of 54.9 k points while the 2200U gets 68.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.3 times faster than the i7-2640M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
810f10
Core
Sandy Bridge
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
PGA 988B
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2011
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
25.86k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
54.86k points
71.02k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-2640M
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.63k
11.54k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
8.33k
19.69k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.08k
4.55k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.82k
3.25k (x0.85)
TOTAL
25.86k
39.03k (x1.51)

Multithread

i7-2640M

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.22k
19.25k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
19.6k
36.27k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.09k
10.2k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
3.07k (x0.78)
TOTAL
54.86k
68.8k (x1.25)

Performance/W
i7-2640M
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
606 points/W
1283 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
560 points/W
2418 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
288 points/W
680 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
205 points/W
TOTAL
1567 points/W
4586 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-2640M
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2752 points/GHz
3394 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2380 points/GHz
5792 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1165 points/GHz
1339 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1092 points/GHz
956 points/GHz
TOTAL
7390 points/GHz
11480 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4