| | | | | | |

Core i7-2600 vs Ryzen 3 3200G


Description
The i7-2600 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-2600 gets a score of 93.7 k points while the 3200G gets 166.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.8 times faster than the i7-2600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
810f81
Core
Sandy Bridge
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2011
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
28.68k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.69k points
168.69k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-2600
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
10.03k
13.05k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
8.91k
22.88k (x2.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.34k
5.39k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.41k
7.31k (x1.35)
TOTAL
28.68k
48.63k (x1.7)

Multithread

i7-2600

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
37.69k
51.73k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
34.22k
87.74k (x2.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.65k
20.74k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.13k
6.57k (x1.59)
TOTAL
93.69k
166.79k (x1.78)

Performance/W
i7-2600
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
397 points/W
796 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
360 points/W
1350 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
186 points/W
319 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
43 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
986 points/W
2566 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-2600
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
2639 points/GHz
3262 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2343 points/GHz
5719 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1141 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1425 points/GHz
1828 points/GHz
TOTAL
7549 points/GHz
12157 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4