| | | | | | |

Core i7-2600 vs i3-1115G4


Description
The i7-2600 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-2600 gets a score of 93.7 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 100.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-2600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
806c1
Core
Sandy Bridge
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
95 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2011
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
28.68k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.69k points
137.96k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-2600
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
10.03k
14.65k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
8.91k
21.57k (x2.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.34k
9.93k (x2.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.41k
8.02k (x1.48)
TOTAL
28.68k
54.18k (x1.89)

Multithread

i7-2600

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
37.69k
32.14k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
34.22k
43.54k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.65k
19.58k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.13k
5.61k (x1.36)
TOTAL
93.69k
100.87k (x1.08)

Performance/W
i7-2600
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
397 points/W
1148 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
360 points/W
1555 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
186 points/W
699 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
43 points/W
200 points/W
TOTAL
986 points/W
3602 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-2600
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2639 points/GHz
3573 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2343 points/GHz
5262 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1141 points/GHz
2423 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1425 points/GHz
1956 points/GHz
TOTAL
7549 points/GHz
13214 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4