Core i7-10870H vs Xeon E5-2660 v2
Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2660 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 375.8 k points while the E5-2660 v2 gets 459.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 375.8 k points while the E5-2660 v2 gets 459.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
306e4
Core
Comet Lake-H
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
8/16
10 /20
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
25600 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
19.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
459.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10870H
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
16.14k
7.26k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
6.9k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
2.77k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.7k
2.55k (x0.2)
TOTAL
59.55k
19.48k (x0.33)
Multithread
i7-10870H
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
117.03k
180.2k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
199.88k
191.43k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.64k
80.22k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.23k
7.46k (x0.91)
TOTAL
375.77k
459.31k (x1.22)
Performance/W
i7-10870H
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2601 points/W
1897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4442 points/W
2015 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1125 points/W
844 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
183 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
8351 points/W
4835 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3227 points/GHz
2420 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4947 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1197 points/GHz
923 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2539 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
11910 points/GHz
6495 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4