| | | |

Core i7-10870H vs i7-1065G7


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 2.3 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
706e5
Core
Comet Lake-H
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
August 2019

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
30376
28194 (-7.18%)
Test#2 (FP)
27947
22133 (-20.81%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6510
10320 (58.52%)
Test#1 (Memory)
14366
14171 (-1.36%)
TOTAL
79200
74818 (-5.53%)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
216184
86387 (-60.04%)
Test#2 (FP)
210824
86216 (-59.11%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51574
32992 (-36.03%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8465
8747 (3.33%)
TOTAL
487048
214342 (-55.99%)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
5759 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
5748 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
2199 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
583 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
14289 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
7229 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
2646 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
3634 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
19184 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9