Core i7-10870H vs i5-10300H
Description
Both models i7-10870H and i5-10300H are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 2 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 2 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
a0652
Core
Comet Lake-H
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
246.07k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.14k
15.65k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
23.13k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
5.66k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.7k
11.43k (x0.9)
TOTAL
59.55k
55.87k (x0.94)
Multithread
i7-10870H
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
117.03k
26.77k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
199.88k
43.81k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.64k
10.17k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.23k
11.91k (x1.45)
TOTAL
375.77k
92.66k (x0.25)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
27.14k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
24.75k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
5.73k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
11.84k (x0.82)
TOTAL
79.2k
69.47k (x0.88)
Multithread
i7-10870H
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
105.77k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
107.47k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
24.82k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
8.02k (x0.95)
TOTAL
487.05k
246.07k (x0.51)
Performance/W
i7-10870H
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
5468 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4