Core i7-10870H vs Ryzen 7 5800X
Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5800X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 5800X gets 558.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 5800X gets 558.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
a20f10
Core
Comet Lake-H
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
32768 kB
Date
September 2020
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
89.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
558.42k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
24.14k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
26.3k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
12.09k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
26.54k (x1.85)
TOTAL
79.2k
89.07k (x1.12)
Multithread
i7-10870H
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
183.54k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
237.27k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
107.95k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
29.66k (x3.5)
TOTAL
487.05k
558.42k (x1.15)
Performance/W
i7-10870H
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
1028 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
282 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
5318 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
5137 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5596 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
2571 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
5646 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
18951 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4