| | | | | | |

Core i7-10870H vs Ryzen 7 5800H


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.1 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
a50f00
Core
Comet Lake-H
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
426.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10870H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.77k
4.31k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
19.81k
17.51k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.29k
10.53k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
23.57k (x1.68)
TOTAL
44.9k
55.92k (x1.25)

Multithread

i7-10870H

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
31.21k
24.18k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
151.01k
117.98k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.13k
70.96k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.37k
8.08k (x0.97)
TOTAL
240.71k
221.19k (x0.92)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
20.37k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
22.52k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
10.18k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
21.49k (x1.5)
TOTAL
79.2k
74.56k (x0.94)

Multithread

i7-10870H

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
144.01k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
191.86k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
84.53k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
6.5k (x0.77)
TOTAL
487.05k
426.9k (x0.88)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4